Karten v. Kent
Karten v. Kent
559 So. 2d 384; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2372; 1990 WL 40311
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Karten v. Kent
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Alan Karten, defendant below, appeals a final judgment against him on a claim for conversion. We conclude that the law of conversion was correctly applied, Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that Paul Kent was not an indispensable party, W.R. Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 512 So.2d 324 (Pla. 3d DCA 1987); and that no reversible error has been shown with respect to the evidentiary rulings.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.