Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Quarles

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 26, 1990 · Cowart, Daniel, Goshorn

560 So. 2d 358; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2882; 1990 WL 51720 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Canal Ins. Co. v. Reed (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION

GOSHORN, Judge.

Petitioner’s motion for clarification of our denial of its petition for certiorari is granted. The order granting respondents’ motion, for summary judgment entered in this cause totally disposes of the claim against the petitioner and will be directly appealable when a final judgment is entered. Fla.R.App.P. 9.110(k). The cases1 cited in support of the petition for certiora-ri are inapposite as applied to the facts of this case.

Because the petitioner has an adequate remedy by way of appeal, certiorari is not *359available. See, e.g., Bohan v. Cal, 524 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Vicorp Restaurants, Inc. v. Aridi, 510 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 519 So.2d 988 (Fla. 1987); National Beverage Suppliers, Inc. v. Esquire Products of Florida, Inc., 493 So.2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Bowl America Florida, Inc. v. Schmidt, 386 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is

DENIED.

DANIEL, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.