Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Murgolo v. State

Murgolo v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 24, 1990 · Daniel, Dauksch, Harris
561 So. 2d 36; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3723; 1990 WL 68664 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst." Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Murgolo v. State

Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Judge.

Angelo Anthony Murgolo appeals his conviction and sentence for purchase of cocaine. His attack on the constitutionality of Chapter 87-243 is without merit. Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990). We affirm the conviction.

Although the court announced appellant’s sentence as three years probation with a condition of 90 days in jail, the judgment reflects 90 days in jail to be followed by three years probation. The sentence is reversed and remanded for correction to conform to the oral pronouncement. See e.g., Mott v. State, 489 So.2d 854 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for correction.

DANIEL, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.