Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Espinosa v. State

Espinosa v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 3, 1990 · Cope, Hubbart, Levy
561 So. 2d 597; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2158; 1990 WL 37418 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Espinosa v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there was probable cause to arrest the defendant; that the trial court correctly denied the motion to suppress the defendant’s post-Miranda* statements; and that there was ample proof of the corpus delicti. See Thomas v. State, 531 So.2d 708, 711 (Fla. 1988).

Affirmed.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑