Espinosa v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal April 3, 1990

Espinosa v. State, 561 So. 2d 597 (1990)

1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2158; 1990 WL 37418

Cope, Hubbart, Levy

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there was probable cause to arrest the defendant; that the trial court correctly denied the motion to suppress the defendant’s post-Miranda* statements; and that there was ample proof of the corpus delicti. See Thomas v. State, 531 So.2d 708, 711 (Fla. 1988).

Affirmed.

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).

Reference

Full Case Name: Maria Consuelo ESPINOSA v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published