Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Griffith v. Griffith

Griffith v. Griffith
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 12, 1990 · Griffin, Peterson, Sharp
561 So. 2d 1205; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2399; 1990 WL 41661 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Griffith v. Griffith

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s “Order on Petitioner’s Motion for Continuance of Support Alimony, Enforcement of Previous Awards, Attorney’s Fees and Other Relief,” dated October 16, 1989, is affirmed in all respects. We observe, however, that the portion of paragraph two of the order that requires educational expenses to be paid for a period of three years is susceptible of various meanings. While the order indicates that *1206the three years begins from the date of enrollment, it does not indicate the time within which enrollment must occur. We suggest clarification for the purpose of specifying the inception date of the three-year period for the benefit of the parties.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for clarification.

SHARP, PETERSON, and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.