Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Rodgers v. Rodgers

Rodgers v. Rodgers
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 7, 1990 · Cowart, Griffin, Orfinger
561 So. 2d 1357; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4075; 1990 WL 74068 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Rodgers v. Rodgers

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the decision below because we cannot characterize as clearly erroneous the determination of the trial judge that the monthly payment provisions of the property settlement agreement were not intended to be alimony. If a party to a dissolution agreement wishes monthly support payments to be construed as alimony, and therefore modifiable in the future, it is prudent that such intent be expressed in the agreement.

COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ. and ORFINGER, M., Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.