Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Hope v. State

Hope v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 26, 1990 · Ervin, Miner, Wentworth
562 So. 2d 863; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4670; 1990 WL 89760 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hope v. State

Opinion of the Court

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence by which he was sentenced as a youthful offender after conviction in an adult court. The record reflects that the trial court did not comply with section 39.111(7)(d), Florida Statutes, which requires a written record of the trial court’s decision to impose adult sanctions against a juvenile. We cannot determine from the record whether the trial court considered each of the six criteria enumerated in section 39.111(7)(c) in determinin'g the suitability of adult sanctions against appellant. Therefore, we reverse and remand for resentencing in compliance with the statute. Martin v. State, 547 So.2d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

ERVIN and MINER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.