M.G. v. State
M.G. v. State
564 So. 2d 630; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5696
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
M.G. v. State
Opinion of the Court
The trial judge entered a disposition order directing that M.G., a child, pay restitution βfor and on behalf of the victim.β Unfortunately, the amount of that restitution was not included in the order. This determination cannot be delegated to a probation officer. Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1988). In point of fact, the order does not purport to delegate this responsibility; rather, the amount of restitution appears to have been inadvertently omitted from the order.
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT HEREWITH.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.