Mays v. State
Mays v. State
565 So. 2d 896; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6442; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2137
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Mays v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we find that although the sentencing judge specifically stated that costs were not imposed, the judgment reflects the imposition of court costs.
Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court for correction of the judgment to delete the imposition of court costs. The judgment and sentence is affirmed in all other respects.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.