Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Bellwether Properties v. Tomberg & Tomberg, P.A.

Bellwether Properties v. Tomberg & Tomberg, P.A.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 8, 1990 · Letts, Walden, Warner
566 So. 2d 18; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5869; 1990 WL 111948 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Bellwether Properties v. Tomberg & Tomberg, P.A.

Concurring Opinion

LETTS, Judge,

specially concurs.

I write specially rather than producing a full-blown opinion which would not, in my opinion, add to the body of the law. However, it needs to be explained that this case began in 1987, was set for trial in December of 1988, said trial on the docket for March 20, 1989. Through all this time and up until the second to the last day of February, 1989, the deposition of the main character in this proceeding was never taken. Further, it was not until March 6, 1989 that a motion to amend the pleadings was filed based on the belated deposition. Under these facts, I cannot hold that Judge Rodgers abused his discretion by refusing to permit the amendment. It is well settled that the liberality espoused in granting mo*19tions to amend “diminishes as the case progresses to trial.” Allett v. Hill, 422 So.2d 1047, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Dissenting Opinion

WALDEN, Judge,

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent because in my opinion under the facts of this case the trial court abused its discretion and committed reversible error in denying Bellwether Properties, Inc., motion to amend pleadings to add an affirmative defense.

I would reverse and remand with instructions to allow such amendment.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, J., concurs. LETTS, J., concurs specially with opinion. WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.