Smith v. State
Smith v. State
566 So. 2d 362; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6723; 1990 WL 127991
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant challenges his judgment and sentence for fraudulent use of a credit card. We find no merit to the appellant’s arguments, except for his contention that the trial court failed to enter written findings pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987), the habitual offender statute.
Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s sentence and remand for the entry of written findings showing the appellant’s status as a habitual offender.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.