Buckles v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Buckles v. State, 567 So. 2d 40 (1990)
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7238; 1990 WL 138410
Cope, Ferguson, Nesbitt

Buckles v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Buckles, defendant below, appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. In substance defendant contends that the trial court should have granted his motion for mistrial because of a police officer’s reference in trial testimony to a handgun discarded by defendant, even though the court’s order in limine prohibited any reference to the firearm. The trial court found that the officer's statement was invited by defense counsel and we conclude that there was a record basis for that finding. Even if it is assumed that the statement was not invited, the court sustained the defendant’s objection to the testimony and gave a curative instruction. In denying the motion for mistrial, the court acted within the bounds of permissible discretion. See Wilson v. State, 436 So.2d 908, 911 (Fla. 1983); Flowers v. State, 351 So.2d 764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ricky BUCKLES v. The STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published