Shultz v. State
Shultz v. State
567 So. 2d 48; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7389
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Shultz v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s convictions for five separate drug-related offenses, as well as the concurrent five-year sentences imposed after he was found guilty of violating probation. However, we remand for correction of the written sentencing forms to reflect that this is not a guideline sentence. The offenses for which appellant was
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.