Austin v. State
Austin v. State
567 So. 2d 1063; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7799; 1990 WL 152119
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Austin v. State
Opinion of the Court
We find no reversible error in the record of appellant’s trial for robbery with a firearm, and so affirm the conviction and sentence. We do agree that court costs and attorneys’ fees were imposed without adequate notice or hearing, and strike that provision without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after adequate notice. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1989).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.