Miller v. State
Miller v. State
568 So. 2d 452; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5601; 1990 WL 161345
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Miller v. State
070rehearing
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We deny the motion but acknowledge that we have rejected appellant’s claim that the habitual offender statute is facially unconstitutional. Johnson v. State, 564 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Broderick v. State, 564 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.