Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Duperier v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 10, 1990 · Letts, Walden, Warner

568 So. 2d 976; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7723; 1990 WL 149751 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Perez v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Fripp v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Jaggers v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. The appellant moved to suppress physical evidence prior to trial, but he failed to object when it was introduced at trial. Thus, he has waived his right to appellate review. Baglio v. State, 467 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Deluca v. State, 384 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). For a comprehensive discussion of this issue, see Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (1927).

*977We find no error in the remaining points raised.

LETTS, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.