Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Wallace v. State

Wallace v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 26, 1990 · Danahy, Hall, Scheb
568 So. 2d 1001; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8209; 1990 WL 162383 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wallace v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that appellant’s sentence of two and one-half years in prison, followed by two years on community control, represents a departure from the sentencing guidelines recommendation. See State v. VanKooten, 522 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1988). Since no reasons for the departure were provided, appellant must be resen-tenced. It appears from the record that the trial court was unaware the sentence represented a departure. Accordingly, the court has the option, after remand, of imposing a departure sentence if supported in writing by valid criteria. State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1989).

Reversed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.