Alexander v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Alexander v. State, 568 So. 2d 1341 (1990)
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8407; 1990 WL 168328
Barfield, Booth, Ervin

Alexander v. State

Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

The upward departure sentence imposed upon appellant is reversed and remanded. The trial court is directed on remand to impose a sentence within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990).

We approve, however, the type of sentence imposed — a probationary split sentence. Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1988); Glass v. State, 556 So.2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), petition for review filed, No. 75,600 (Fla. Feb. 27, 1990) (oral argument scheduled Dec. 6, 1990). As in Glass, however, we certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES OF SECTION 921.187, FLORIDA STATUTES?

REVERSED and REMANDED in part, and APPROVED in part.

BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael Jerome ALEXANDER v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published