Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Curry v. State

Curry v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 6, 1990 · Nimmons, Shivers, Smith
568 So. 2d 1346; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8601; 1990 WL 175054 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Curry v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Cobb v. State, 567 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR § 921.087, FLA. STAT.?
SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.