Veloso v. State
Veloso v. State
568 So. 2d 1358; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8564; 1990 WL 175896
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
While we affirm the denial of appellant’s motion, the record reflects inconsistencies in the expressed intent of the trial court. Accordingly, we remand with direction to correct the judgment to reflect properly the trial court’s intent upon the withholding of adjudication.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.