Ramos v. State
Ramos v. State
569 So. 2d 1374; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8886; 1990 WL 180921
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ramos v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon. However, we agree with appellant that attorney’s fees and costs were improperly imposed against him in the final judgment after not being mentioned at the sentencing hearing. Because the written order does not properly conform to the oral pro
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.