Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Ramos v. State

Ramos v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 21, 1990 · Campbell, Patterson, Threadgill
569 So. 2d 1374; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8886; 1990 WL 180921 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Ramos v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon. However, we agree with appellant that attorney’s fees and costs were improperly imposed against him in the final judgment after not being mentioned at the sentencing hearing. Because the written order does not properly conform to the oral pro*1375nouncement, we strike the fees and costs without prejudice to reimpose if the court follows proper procedures.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.