Morris v. State
Morris v. State
570 So. 2d 1113; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9311; 1990 WL 192314
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Morris v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction. However, the trial court imposed costs against the indigent defendant and the record fails to reflect that the defendant was afforded notice or an opportunity to object, contrary to Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988). Therefore, we reverse that portion of the judgment which assesses the costs. See also Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.