Pease v. State
Pease v. State
570 So. 2d 1116; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9169; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2949
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Pease v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the defendant’s convictions. Since the defendant’s sentence constitutes a more than one cell increase for a violation of probation, see Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1989), we reverse and remand for resentencing within the range permitted by the guidelines.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.