Fulton v. State
Fulton v. State
570 So. 2d 1156; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9709; 1990 WL 205508
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Fulton v. State
Opinion of the Court
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision of the judgment without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgment and sentence are in all other respects affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.