Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Delva v. State

Delva v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 20, 1990 · Baskin, Cope, Nesbitt
571 So. 2d 1; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1773; 1990 WL 154195 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Delva v. State

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We deny the State’s motion for rehearing.

We grant the State’s request for certification of a question of great public importance:

In a case tried prior to the decision in State v. Dominguez, 509 So.2d 917 (Fla. 1987), is it fundamental error to fail to instruct the jury that in order to convict, the State must prove that defendant knew the substance contained in the package in defendant’s car was cocaine, where the instructions were susceptible of the reading that knowing possession of the package containing the substance was sufficient to convict, and where the error is urged on direct appeal from the conviction, not on collateral attack.

Motion for rehearing denied; question certified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.