Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1990

Burke Co. v. United States Telephone Co.

Burke Co. v. United States Telephone Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 2, 1990 · Barkdull, Cope, Ferguson
571 So. 2d 33; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7418; 1990 WL 143655 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Burke Co. v. United States Telephone Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We conclude, contrary to the position of appellant The Burke Company, that a trial court has discretion in the application of Rule 1.060(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Here, defendant Burke successfully moved for a transfer of venue under Rule 1.060. Under Rule 1.060(c), plaintiff United States Telephone Company was obliged to pay the clerk’s service charge within thirty days but inadvertently failed to do so. The charge was promptly paid as soon as U.S. Telephone learned it was overdue. Burke contends that the trial court was nonetheless required to dismiss without prejudice under Rule 1.060(c), given that the payment was late. We disagree. The court had discretion in the matter. There is not the slightest suggestion of prejudice to Burke, and the position taken by the trial court is consistent with the admonition that the “rules shall be construed to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action.” Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.010.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.