Wright v. State
Wright v. State
579 So. 2d 418; 1991 WL 86812
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wright v. State
Opinion
Tommy WRIGHT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Saltiel, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. However, we have not considered the constitutional attack on Chapter 89-280, amending the Habitual Offender Statute, as appellant would have been habitualized under the pre-amended statute as well. See Henderson v. Antonacci, 62 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1952).
ANSTEAD, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.