Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Gantt v. State

Gantt v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 16, 1991 · Anstead, Letts, Polen
572 So. 2d 569; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 210; 1991 WL 2787 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Gantt v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no error by the trial court in concluding that the appellant failed to testify “truthfully” at the trial of a codefendant thus violating a provision of *570appellant’s agreement with the state. In addition to considering the record herein, which we consider sufficient to support af-firmance, we have also considered the record in the codefendant’s case pursuant to appellant’s request at oral argument that we do so.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.