Lunger v. Hinckley
Lunger v. Hinckley
572 So. 2d 1042; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 360; 1991 WL 4324
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Lunger v. Hinckley
Opinion of the Court
We sua sponte strike Betty Lunger as a named respondent.
The respondent concedes error. We grant the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition and quash the order of the trial court on the authority of Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 558 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.