Bada v. State
Bada v. State
Opinion of the Court
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
The State of Florida correctly concedes “that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to afford [the] defendant adequate opportunity to impeach the State’s witness by introducing the victim’s prior statements which were inconsistent with his present testimony”. See Kimble v. State, 537 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); § 90.608(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1987).
Accordingly, the defendant’s convictions and sentences for armed robbery and armed burglary are reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial on these two charges. Because the defendant raises no
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.