Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Ledesma v. Bankers Insurance Co.

Ledesma v. Bankers Insurance Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 5, 1991 · Gersten, Jorgenson, Nesbitt
573 So. 2d 1042; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 803; 1991 WL 11742 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Ledesma v. Bankers Insurance Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Victor Ledesma, appeals a final order denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees based on the alleged failure of appellee, Bankers Insurance Company, to timely pay personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under an automobile insurance policy. We affirm the order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees because the record clearly establishes that appellee paid the benefits sued for within thirty days of having been furnished with the bills and application for payment. A PIP insurer has thirty days after being “furnished written notice of the fact of a covered loss and of the amount of same,” to make payment. § 627.736(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989); see Obando v. Fortune Insurance Company, 563 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.