Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Cordoves v. State

Cordoves v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 5, 1991 · Gersten, Jorgenson, Nesbitt
574 So. 2d 1157; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 804; 1991 WL 11735 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cordoves v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s conviction as it was within the jury’s province to believe the lay testimony over the expert testimony. Byrd v. State, 297 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1974).

However, upon the state’s proper confession of error, we reverse the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing. By sentencing the defendant to three years of incarceration to be followed by five years of probation, the trial court imposed the functional equivalent of an eight-year sentence for an offense punishable by a maximum sentence of five years. See State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1978); Gonzalez v. State, 546 So.2d 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.