Salmon v. State
Salmon v. State
575 So. 2d 808; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2120; 1991 WL 32463
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Salmon v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially with opinion.
I believe this case should be affirmed only because the appellant failed to object to the facially sufficient reasons offered by the State to explain why it challenged the black prospective jurors. See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225, 1229-30 (Fla. 1990).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.