Patino v. Dade County Chapter of the National Organization for Women
Patino v. Dade County Chapter of the National Organization for Women
Opinion of the Court
The record demonstrates that the trial court abused its discretion in entering the injunction against the appellants herein when there was an absence of evidence to connect these appellants with the acts sought to be enjoined. Accordingly, the injunction, to the extent that it relates to these appellants, must be reversed.
Reversed.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, J., concur.
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part, dissenting in part).
I concur with the majority opinion insofar as the record does not reveal any evidence of the involvement of appellants, American Life League, Inc., Human Life International, Inc., and Reverend Paul Marx, in the enjoined activities. However, I must dissent as to appellant Reverend Henry Patino because there is evidence in the record that he participated in those activities.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.