Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Dunn v. State

Dunn v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 9, 1991 · Booth, Smith, Wigginton
577 So. 2d 692; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3815; 1991 WL 46829 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dunn v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant asserts that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel; (2) his plea was not freely and voluntarily entered, as he was under the influence of medication at the time he entered his plea; and (3) the trial erred m refusing to allow him to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing.

The trial court summarily denied the motion but failed to attach those portions of the record which support the grounds for denial. See Stinyard v. State, 476 So.2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), and Vann v. State, 561 So.2d 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We therefore reverse and remand the trial court’s order for proceedings consistent herewith.

BOOTH, SMITH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.