Samhat v. Griffin
Samhat v. Griffin
577 So. 2d 710; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3346; 1991 WL 53560
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Samhat v. Griffin
Opinion of the Court
In this action for work done on a condominium project this is an appeal by the property owner, Harold Samhat, and the surety, Reliance Insurance Co., from a final judgment in favor of a subcontractor, Curtis F. Griffin, Jr., Inc. Of the five points raised by appellants, we find merit only in their contention that the trial court erred in ruling that Samhat is personally liable to Griffin. See Samhat v. Cocoa Masonry of Pinellas County, Inc., 567 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We find no merit in the cross-appeal.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for the vacating of the judgment as to Samhat personally.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.