Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Searcy v. Skidmore

Searcy v. Skidmore
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 14, 1991 · Cowart, Griffin, Harris
577 So. 2d 967; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2191; 1991 WL 33011 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Searcy v. Skidmore

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this Petition for Writ of Mandamus, the petitioner would have us order the trial judge to act on a motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 which, petitioner alleges, he has filed in the trial court. A copy of the docket sheet in this case certified by the clerk of the trial court reveals no motion under Rule 1.540. Accordingly, we deny the Petition for Writ of Mandamus without prejudice to the petitioner filing, if he otherwise can, a timely and authorized motion under Rule 1.540.

PETITION DENIED without prejudice.

COWART, HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.