Douglas v. State
Douglas v. State
578 So. 2d 52; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3593; 1991 WL 58883
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Douglas v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant contends his sentencing as an habitual offender was invalid because it was based on two prior convictions of the same date. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As the second supplemental record shows, this was not the case.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.