Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Zahoranski v. State

Zahoranski v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 8, 1991 · Anstead, Farmer, Stone
578 So. 2d 900; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4469; 1991 WL 71551 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Zahoranski v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence but remand the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of entry of an amended judgment which reflects that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere rather than a plea of guilty; and entry of an amended order of revocation which reflects the trial court’s determination that appellant violated his probation only by violating condition (3) thereof, rather than the several violations erroneously contained therein.

ANSTEAD, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.