Mathis v. State
Mathis v. State
580 So. 2d 892; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6287; 1991 WL 103422
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Mathis v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant appeals his conviction of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. We affirm but remand for correction of the scrivener’s error in the written judgment and sentence indicating that appellant pled nolo contendere when, in fact, he was found guilty by a jury.
AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of the scrivener’s error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.