Ingram v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Ingram v. State, 580 So. 2d 896 (1991)
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6305; 1991 WL 104658
Anstead, Hersey, Warner

Ingram v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. Although we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in allowing a prosecution witness to be impeached, we find such error to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 *897So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). Our conclusion is mainly predicated upon the admission of other substantial evidence concerning the witness’ prior identification of the appellant as his assailant.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Frederick INGRAM v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published