Smith v. State
Smith v. State
583 So. 2d 793; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8211; 1991 WL 150427
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant raises numerous points on appeal but we only find merit in his contention that his sentence should reflect that he was sentenced as a habitual offender under the 1987 statute and is, therefore, entitled to gain time.
Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence but remand for correction of the sentence to reflect that the appellant was habitualized under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987), and is entitled to gain time.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.