H.S. v. State
H.S. v. State
583 So. 2d 807; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8318; 1991 WL 152949
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
H.S. v. State
Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to the concession by the State of Florida which correctly agrees “that the State failed to produce evidence showing the value of the object that was involved in the grand theft ... ”, the adjudication of grand theft is reversed, with this case being remanded to the trial court for the purpose of entering an adjudication for pet-it theft in connection with Count II of the Petition. See Cofield v. State, 474 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.