Pierce v. State
Pierce v. State
583 So. 2d 1095; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7220; 1991 WL 154810
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Pierce v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
070rehearing
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing for the purpose of certifying the following question to be of great public importance:
DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED.
GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.