Pearson & Maluso, M.D., P.A. v. Bott

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Pearson & Maluso, M.D., P.A. v. Bott, 584 So. 2d 1035 (1991)
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7550; 1991 WL 134863
Dauksch, Goshorn, Peterson

Pearson & Maluso, M.D., P.A. v. Bott

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a temporary injunction. We quash the injunction because it was entered without proper verified pleadings or sworn evidentiary support. Additionally, the trial judge failed to make sufficient factual determinations to support the injunction. See e.g., City of Miami v. Coll, 546 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); United Steelworkers of America v. Seminole Asphalt Refining, Inc., 269 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).

The order is quashed and this cause remanded. Should appellee submit a new, proper petition for injunctive relief the court can entertain and grant it, if it deems it appropriate.

ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
PEARSON & MALUSO, M.D., P.A. v. William BOTT, etc.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published