Codias v. Gati
Codias v. Gati
585 So. 2d 502; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9542; 1991 WL 181458
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Codias v. Gati
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.
Concurring Opinion
(specially concurring).
Although I am convinced that the trial judge erred in determining that the appel-lees were not liable for breach of their contract with the appellant, I concur in affirmance because the only showing of the appellant’s damages was based on a liquidated damages clause which was plainly inapplicable to the present situation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.