Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1991

Chestnut v. State

Chestnut v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 2, 1991 · Anstead, Farmer, Polen
586 So. 2d 101; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 15185; 1991 WL 193341 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Chestnut v. State

Opinion of the Court

UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is denied but we substitute the following for our original opinion.

*102We dismiss Chestnut’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice to his filing motions in the circuit court, under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.111 and 3.800(a), for appointment of counsel and correction of a sentence which petitioner alleges is illegal.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.