AFFIRMED. The record reveals that the police activity conducted by the confidential informant did not have as its end the interruption of a specific ongoing criminal activity. See State v. Hunter, 586 So.2d 319, 320 (Fla. 1991); Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985). Appellant’s past criminal activity had ceased by the time the confidential informant first made contact with him.