Hill v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Hill v. State, 588 So. 2d 46 (1991)
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10739; 1991 WL 216497
Allen, Kahn, Wentworth

Hill v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted and sentenced for robbery with a deadly weapon, aggravated assault, and simple battery, all growing out of a single criminal episode on July 30, 1990. He argues that he should not have been convicted and sentenced for the aggravated assault and the simple battery because the statutory elements of those crimes are subsumed by the statutory elements of robbery with a deadly weapon. See section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (1989). Upon authority of our decisions in Brown v. State, 569 So.2d 1320 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Cave v. State, 578 So.2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), we reject the appellant’s arguments.

The judgments and sentences are affirmed.

ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Leon Lamar HILL v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published