Polite v. State
Polite v. State
588 So. 2d 330; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11365; 1991 WL 231785
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Polite v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant has urged that he entered a negotiated plea of nolo contendere to a charge of grand theft, with the understanding that he would receive a five-year sentence. He appeals the imposition of an eight-year sentence as an habitual felony offender, alleging the trial court erred in imposing a sentence greater than the five-year sentence appellant understood he would receive, without affording appellant an opportunity to withdraw the plea. We affirm, without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a motion to withdraw his plea. See Murray v. State, 566 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.